This image was lost some time after publication.

By now you've probably read enough about the Judith Regan firing to make you wish that O.J. were actually innocent. But there's been one important issue we've yet to see addressed: How did the blogs cover the coverage of the firing? Let's take a quick look back to this morning:

  • 9:04 A.M.: FishbowlNY takes an extensive look back at everything that's been written since the news broke on Jossip Friday night.
  • 9:30 A.M.: After a rare Saturday post, Gawker puts a bunch of newspaper articles in its media linkdump.
  • 10:04 Radar takes an extensive look back at everything that's been written since the news broke on Jossip Friday night.
  • 10:15 A.M.: GalleyCat summarizes the responses, pro and con, to Regan's firing.
  • 10:41 A.M.: Eat the Press takes an extensive look back at everything that's been written since the news broke on Jossip Friday night.
  • 12:30 P.M. In another linkdump item, Gawker reports the rumor of Regan's mezuzah-hating ways.
  • 12:50 P.M.: Gawker covers the coverage of the Judith Regan firing coverage.
  • Updates as warranted.
  • Update: Scandal! Have we misattributed the breaking of this story? A tipster writes, "Like every other story in the free world, Drudge broke it before anyone..735pm Friday, a good two hours before everyone else picked it up."