This image was lost some time after publication.

Yesterday we learned that, contrary to all of our assumptions, Judith Regan's offensive comments during her last-straw phone call with HarperCollins lawyer Mark Jackson were anti-Semitic, not cock-size related. Today in the Times, Jackson accuses Regan of saying, "Of all people, the Jews should know about ganging up, finding common enemies and telling the big lie," and of saying that Jackson, ICM lit agent Esther Newberg, HarperCollins' executive editor (and Deadspin soccer columnist!) David Hirshey and HarperCollins' president Jane Friedman "constitute a Jewish cabal against her."

However, Regan lawyer Bert Fields reminds us once again why anti-Semites hire Jewish lawyers. Not only does he deny that Regan said "Jewish cabal," he also asserts that he wouldn't have been offended if she had. "I want to make it clear that had she said it, even that is not an anti-Semitic remark," he said. "Had she said it, I wouldn't be offended, as a Jew." Speak for yourself, Bert! Maybe the rest of the cabal isn't as replete with self-hatred as you are!

Oh, wait: of course they are, they're Jews.

New Dispute Over Firing of Publisher [NYT]