Who's the Next Rich Sap to Blow His Wad on Journalism?
In your Byzantine Monday media column: searching for a rich media savior, a recipe duplication scandal, the future of robot media is $1 per hour, and STEPHEN A. SMITH is back in your area code.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0f31/b0f3108f089f61f62561074919ab250bf34c588b" alt=""
Simon Dumenco points out the impolite fact that "much of the best of contemporary journalism has been produced, and continues to get produced, simply because of the largess — and the emotional needs — of a small group of rich people." And where is the next crop of generous, fabulously wealthy media patrons, he wonders? Hmm. Well nothing will dissuade Jared Kushner for at least a few more months, so that's one.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a695/3a695e60bbc12e4da8b993d92efe4a1b0a2b671f" alt=""
Recipe scandal: Health magazine re-used some recipes from fellow Time Inc. title Real Simple! If consumers cannot be absolutely sure that no subscribers to semi-related magazines have ever prepared this particular chicken dish before us, how are we to live?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/044f8/044f86631521c102abdbfebc33d7fee8be897793" alt=""
David Carr takes a look at robot "journalism" word factory Demand Media, which pays poor freelancers paltry wages to write up stories on computer-generate Google-trending topics like, oh, I don't know, "How to pick the lock of the Jersey Shore house with a Swiss Army brand pocketknife." Carr notes that after spending 20 hours on his story, "At Demand's current pay rate, I'd be making almost a buck an hour." Oh, does the New York Times pay more than that? ZING.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d85b/7d85b56de111dddadf2b6968cff2b5752053949a" alt=""
TERRIBLE, DECLARATIVE SPORTS COLUMNIST STEPHEN A. SMITH IS BACK TO WRITING FOR THE PHILLY ENQUIRER. HOLLER AT STEVE—IF YOU MAKE THE CUT.