losers
Whoops, Barack Obama Forgot to Care About the Gays Again
Pareene · 11/04/09 10:57AMThe New York Mets' Only Win: Bernie Madoff
Hamilton Nolan · 10/22/09 09:59AMHow Can We Lose Some Weight?
Hamilton Nolan · 10/06/09 10:45AMThe Losers' Guide to the NYC Mayoral Race
Hamilton Nolan · 07/28/09 01:53PMLanny Davis Now Hurting Two Countries
Pareene · 07/15/09 02:43PMRuth Madoff: Unsympathetic Figure
Hamilton Nolan · 07/08/09 09:00AMMicrotrend: You're No 'Professional'
Hamilton Nolan · 05/14/09 10:51AM'Pollster Grifter' Bilks Innocent Secretary Out of $2.3 Million
Pareene · 04/17/09 11:50AMRNC Has New Loser Chairman
Pareene · 01/30/09 05:15PMOne More For the "Get Fired in '09" List
Pareene · 12/30/08 06:23PMInept Man Invents Trends For Imaginary Audience
Hamilton Nolan · 12/18/08 11:28AMAxl Rose Kills US Economy
Hamilton Nolan · 12/16/08 01:34PMMark Penn Has a Well-Compensated Newspaper Job, Still No Justice in Universe
Pareene · 12/11/08 01:41PMLoser Flack Headed to State?
Pareene · 11/24/08 04:34PMBill Kristol Takes on News Legend, Loses
Pareene · 11/19/08 06:20PMOld-school journo Pete Hamill and Bill Kristol got together for a little argument, filmed by IFC's new Gideon Yago-hosted thing The IFC Media Project. As Bill Kristol is a sad joke and Pete Hamill is a legend, it was not really a fair fight. The topic, thankfully, allowed Bill to shill for his miserable lost war instead of having to defend Sarah Palin again. Hamill still schooled him. Kristol doesn't really think Americans need to see the "blood" and "coffins" that war creates, that way we can all feel much better about ourselves.
Bill Kristol Not Long For This Op-Ed Page
Pareene · 11/18/08 04:30PMTimes columnist Bill Kristol went on Fox back in June and told the world that this governor from Alaska named Sarah Palin would be the best Vice President ever! He loved her, very much, because she was a maverick. Five months later, she is a national joke, and he is a sad, sad man, trying desperately to salvage his credibility. "I met her for the second time in my life. I know we're supposed to be such great friends, but the truth is I've met her twice... I've spoken to her on the phone once. For all our great closeness," he tells The Observer, "I barely know her." Too late, Bill. You're all washed up! Since time immemorial the New York Times has kept its rich old conservative readers slightly satisfied with some token conservative voices in the Op-Ed section. For many, many years there was reliable old Bill Safire, the Nixon speechwriter, a member of the smart old educated class of Republicans who were able to write up support for disastrous policy implemented by the corrupt and incompetent with smart, almost plausible-sounding arguments. He left, replaced with John Tierney, a libertarian-leaning sort who didn't last long on the op-ed beat and now writes "researchers say a counterintutive thing" features instead. And there is David Brooks, a quietly doctrinaire Republican who fancies up his usual party line with armchair sociology. But Brooks broke with the party this year, calling Sarah Palin a cancer, leaving only poor, dumb, Bill Kristol. Bill Kristol, who tried to sell America on Sarah Palin, and ended up repeatedly embarrassing himself, over and over again, and losing John McCain his election. Now he just mumbles about hating the mainstream media, to all his mainstream media friends, in the pages of the New York Times. Already the vultures are wondering who'll replace him—you can be terribly wrong and stupid and remain a Times columnist indefinitely, but you must be terribly wrong and stupid in the service of the conventional wisdom. So Tom Friedman's Iraq columns get a pass, as does Maureen Dowd's constant stream of nonsense. But Kristol is no longer merely just a hack, he's a failed hack. No one bought his line this year. So maybe someone nutty and anti-Palin like, say, David Frum is next for the Affirmative Action Conservative Slot?
John McCain's Sad Ohio Party
Ryan Tate · 11/04/08 10:01PMThe saddest thing about the scene at John McCain's headquarters "party" in Columbus has to be the "Victory in Ohio" sign, captured in an near-poetic camera pan at the end of this video. The klieg lights probably aren't helping the McCain crew with its depression. Might we suggest bourbon?
The Amazing True Story of the Last Democratic Infomercial
Pareene · 10/29/08 01:48PMTonight, Barack Obama will appear on your television screen for 30 minutes in order to convince you to vote for him next week. He'll be on CBS, NBC, Univision, Fox, MSNBC, and BET. (But not ABC! Tune in for Pushing Daisies!) Obama's half-hour TV buy tonight has some historical precedent, of course; Ross Perot did it, and look where it got him! But for a good look at how far the Democrats have come, let's all go back to 1983, when the Democratic National Committee hosted, yes, a telethon. It, uh, it didn't go so well. In fact it went unbelievably, comically awry. As the 1980s began, the Republicans introduced and perfected their massive, modern fundraising apparatus, utilizing direct mail and donor targeting to build a database of party supporters willing to shell out cash whenever and wherever it was needed. In 1980, the GOP raised millions more from hundreds of thousands more than the Dems could manage. And they kicked the Democrats' asses. So, heading into the 1984 elections, the Democrats knew they needed a lot of cash to compete. The GOP had more than a million active donors, the Dems had almost 300,000. So the Democratic National Committee somehow decided that a star-studded telethon on NBC would solve the problem. They spent $5 million on the program, hoping to raise an initial $10 million over 18 hours on Memorial Day weekend. And it was a star-studded affair! As the AP reported:
'Sun' Failed For Good Reason
Pareene · 09/30/08 11:59AMWhen we remember the New York Sun, we'll try to remember the great local reporting and the fantastic sports page and the serious and smart arts coverage. Not so much the ideological inanity and loud constant taking of the precisely wrong side of every important issue of this miserable era. In trying to remember them that way, of course, one is best advised to skip most of their farewell edition. The goodbyes are not self-pitying, at least, but they reveal a newspaper that imagines it had some small role in the destruction of this country while turning a blind eye to the many myriad ways they could've continued on their crusade if they hadn't been so utterly out of touch. The opening of the farewell editorial sets the scene: